home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cs.vu.nl!sun4nl!xs4all!marketgraph!rvg
- From: rvg@marketgraph.xs4all.nl (Ruud van Gaal)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: open vs fopen?
- Message-ID: <0416sbn60.alamito@marketgraph.xs4all.nl>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 96 18:22:04 CET
- References: <uEYFxc9nX8WX083yn@mbnet.mb.ca> <4f8bev$6tr@hermes.louisville.edu> <4fbfno$7f@noc.tor.hookup.net> <4fd7st$kcm@umbc9.umbc.edu>
- Reply-To: rvg@marketgraph.xs4all.nl
- X-Newsreader: Alamito Mail and News Manager (V2.0.4 for Waffle) registered to MARKETGRAPH VISUAL AUTOMATION
-
- In <4fd7st$kcm@umbc9.umbc.edu> schlein@umbc.edu (Jonas J. Schlein) wrote:
-
- >Here's some logic:
- >
- >If open() is ANSI then all ANSI C compilers must have it.
- >There exists an ANSI C compiler that does not have open().
- >Therefore, open() is a non-ANSI C function.
-
- Or the ANSI C compiler has a bug. I prefer:
- If open() is ANSI then all ANSI C compilers must have it.
- There exists an ANSI standard that does not have open().
- Therefore, open() is a non-ANSI C function.
- :) waste of bandwidth, I presume...
-
- --
- Ruud van Gaal
- MarketGraph Visual Automation
- E-Mail : rvg@marketgraph.xs4all.nl
- DoomShell 4.5 homepage: http://www.xs4all.nl/~jwkorver
- "...Works fascinates me. I could sit and watch it for hours..."
-
-